The European Renaissance: one of the great over-collected
and over-studied periods of Art History.
I say this not to disparage the Renaissance, which was a time of
interesting, unprecedented change, but to emphasize how entrenched our stories
of this era are. A thousand times over,
art historians have used paintings and sculptures from Europe’s 1400s and 1500s
to build an overarching picture of an era. This picture illustrates a time
influenced by Humanist beliefs and renewed interest in Roman and Greek culture,
a time with a shifts in religious thought, a time with new developments in
disciplines from mathematics to philosophy.
All of these aspects are visible in Renaissance art, and they feature in
reiterations everywhere, from our history textbooks to our museum halls.
Last week I stumbled upon an ad for the opening of a new
show at the Walter’s Museum in Baltimore, titled African Presence in Renaissance Europe. I was instantly intrigued: here is a new angle
on this favorite era. I had never heard
of an African presence in Renaissance Europe –that isn’t usually part of the narrative
of the era. The very idea of this
exhibit highlights of one of the things I love the most about working in the
art and culture field: history is a palimpsest, and digging into its
complicated depths may suddenly reveal new layers of truth. No matter how many exhibits there have been
on Renaissance art, and now many times studies have corroborated our theories
about Renaissance developments, the art works still hold more stories within
their frames, stories we aren’t able to see until we figure out the right
questions to ask.
With the help of new technological developments in
navigation, in the 1400s, people of the European continent were interacting
with people of the African continent more than they had in a century, since
North Africa was part of the Roman Empire.
Ergo, the thinkers behind the exhibition reasoned, we should see a
proliferation of interpretations of Africa and Africans within European
Renaissance art. What shaped the
discourse about Africa and Africans in Europe during the Renaissance? What were the interactions between Europeans
and Africans like? What roles did
Africans play in Europe? African Presence in Renaissance Europe is
structured on these new, open-minded questions. Armed with this new set of questions, scholars
can find evidence of an African presence in Europe all over the Renaissance
art, in aspects not particularly hidden, but nonetheless often overlooked
earlier generations of art historians.
Girolamo da Santacroce Adoration of the Kings 1525-30 oil on panel, 27" x 32" |
I took the train to
Baltimore to see the exhibit last Sunday, the first day it opened. The exhibit starts with a gorgeous painting
of a nativity scene with the three kings, one king portrayed as a black man, as
became a common piece of Christian iconography starting in the 1400s. (We’ve all seen these representations of the
nativity with a black king. But have we
ever thought about what this black king represented to Renaissance artists and
art viewers? Who acted as the model for
the painting?)
Moving around the corner from the first painting, I entered
the first gallery, a space focusing on the European historical context. I looked at a lot of old illustrated books,
of which the Walter’s has an impressive collection. In the travel books, atlases and scientific
tombs of the time, the mix of study and stereotypes highlighted the increased
encounters between Europe and Africa.
The next gallery showed examples of African presence in
Christian iconography, and in the iconography of other key Renaissance stories,
such as Shakespeare’s Antony and
Cleopatra. Next came a gallery of
portraits. A decent sized minority
population of Africans lived in some European cities –diplomats, business
people, merchants, artisans, servants and slaves- and all of them appear in
studies and portraits by European Renaissance artists.
Some portraits from the exhibition, featured on the Walter's website |
By the beginning of the 1600s, the diversity of roles that
Africans played in European society dwindled, as the European image of Africa
became irrevocably entwined with the inhuman slave trade to the colonies in the
New World. But between 1400 and 1600, the
exhibition demonstrated for me that there was far more complex interaction, and
fluidity between Europe and Africa than I would have thought. Plenty of racism existed, but it was
inchoate, mixed, not as all-powerful as in later manifestations.
As is appropriate for an exhibit that is trying to break
with ingrained beliefs about the Renaissance, there were a lot of opportunities
for visitors to interact and participate in the exhibit. “Conversation Cubes”, with a question on each
side, sat on a bench at the center of the exhibit, provoking visitors to think
about issues of art and ethnic identity that the exhibit brought up. “How does art contribute to the shaping of
identity?” and “How does previous knowledge influence the perception of the
artwork?” are two examples of questions from these cubes.
An adjacent gallery displayed the results of interactive
projects between the museum and Baltimore middle schools. In the preceding months, classes had talked
about the art to be featured in the exhibit, and had responded to it creatively. This gallery displayed student work ranging
from drawings of new imagined scenes featuring historical people from the
exhibit, to a class letter to their textbook company, pointing out how little
Africans are ever mentioned in history textbooks and calling for this gap to be
rectified. I enjoyed seeing these
contemporary responses to the exhibit; they enhanced its message by demonstrated
that the new questions being asked about this over-studied period are making an
impact on how we think about the Renaissance.
No comments:
Post a Comment