tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8227448234251304484.post9069118299045306673..comments2023-10-04T01:30:11.599-07:00Comments on A New Art History: Useful Art History WebsitesAlexishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13206198486088333682noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8227448234251304484.post-79345254604621818882012-01-24T19:50:06.460-08:002012-01-24T19:50:06.460-08:00I guess which art is bad enough to qualify is most...I guess which art is bad enough to qualify is mostly up to the curator. It seems like he/she finds particularly bad works which take on an art movement and apply it in a way that kind of makes the viewer cringe. (Sunday on the Pot with George is pointillism applied awkwardly to an even more awkward subject).<br /><br />Of course what is ugly is just as subjective as what is beautiful, so we are certainly allowed to disagree with the curator's choices.Alexishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13206198486088333682noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8227448234251304484.post-4628627568333060472012-01-24T18:08:12.443-08:002012-01-24T18:08:12.443-08:00I like the MOBA site. But what makes art bad enou...I like the MOBA site. But what makes art bad enough to qualify?!<br /><br />- abbaBilbo from Californiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16256378477206544839noreply@blogger.com